JumpStart: IdeaExchange Blog

In 2008, according to PWC MoneyTree and VentureXpert, Ohio moved into the top quartile, among all states, for number of venture capital deals. In 2009, Ohio moved into the Top 10. The states ahead of Ohio are: California, Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania, Texas, Washington, New Jersey, Colorado, and Maryland. Ohio is the only Midwestern state to break into the Top 10.

As far as $$ invested, we are lower down on the list — 21st in 2009, where historically, over 10-15 years, Ohio has ranged from 9th to 28th, averaging about 21st. In order to move up to a Top 10 spot, investors would need to more than double the amount of capital going into Ohio’s early-stage companies. Has something like this been done before? Yup: Maryland, for example, moved from 22nd in 1992 and 25th in 1993 to 8th in 2006.   

So, risk-oriented investors might say, “That’s fine, Becca — love your passion for Ohio’s innovation environment — but, um, what about returns?” My answer is that they are pretty good: an analysis done by Chrysalis Ventures shows that returns in Midwestern deals were higher than returns in every other region except California and the Southeast (where the Southeast had fewer deals than the Midwest). I have not reviewed this analysis since 2006, but even if updating shows it to have fallen, the 2006 data do show that strong returns can be generated in the Midwest — Ohio included.

Those same risk-oriented investors might next say, “Yeah, but what about exits? As investors, we know, obviously, returns are a sign of exits, but still, how about stories: do you have great stories of exits, stories that capture the imagination and define a region? Where’s your Google? Your Amgen?”

OK, I have to admit: you got me there. We do not have many of those tales of Stanford PhDs or MIT wunderkinds opening up entirely new industries and IPO’ing five nanoseconds later, and let’s face it: those are fun, iconic tales that generated great returns and captured the imagination. But, here is the good news. An analysis I recently saw showed that Ohio entrepreneurs and investors are actually quite good at something that may be emerging as an enduring investment thesis in the venture industry: entrepreneurs raising money in a capital efficient manner from smaller funds and growing solidly and well to provide those funds with nice returns, IRRs that are above-equity-stock-indices-and-above-venture-IRRs-as-a-whole-but-(admittedly)-no-Google/Amgen.  

I cannot, alas, offer here the details of this analysis because the person who conducted it is a trusted Ohio investor who was able to get many of his peer investors to offer up information that they requested not be made public. But I can, for illustrative purposes, offer up names of some of the companies whose exits were public domain and that collectively make the point that we do have exits, good exits, sometimes great exits, but admittedly not iconic, blockbuster exits. In IT, over the past 5-10 years, Ohio entrepreneurs and investors have seen exits from angel or venture-backed companies like Hyland, Plansoft, Brulant, Flashline, TMW Systems, Everstream, MRI, Northcoast PCS, Entek, and many more. In Healthcare, over the past handful of years, there is WholeHealth, MemberHealth, RIS Logic, Edgepark Surgical, Cleveland BioLabs, Atricure, NDI Medical, and many more. In Cleantech, of late, there is Sorbent Technologies and Solar Fields, plus others, and in Business Services, there is Flight Options, Atomic Dog Publishing, and more.

So, here is the summary of all this. Ohio is Top 10 nationwide in investment activity and Ohio’s entrepreneurial strengths are in areas where the venture industry may well be moving: Ohio growth businesses and entrepreneurs are capital efficient and, among states, Ohio is among the leaders on consistently starting strong, high growth businesses that pragmatically solve a certain problem in the world, grow quickly, and generate solid returns. This entrepreneurial mindset, or strategy, if you want to call it that, offers an outsized return to investors as shown by the Chrysalis analysis. The entrepreneurs who led these businesses are adept at growing more of these types of businesses as CEOs, serial entrepreneurs, angel investors, and board members.

These are all reasonable strengths to build on. With a lot of effort, which is what anything worth doing takes, we could become a Top 5 state in venture activity (deals, not dollars, given the more capital efficient nature of Ohio growth stories). Wouldn’t that be great?  

That’s not a rhetorical question, because I guess what I want to know is this: is this compelling? Is the paucity of iconic IPOs that capture the imagination, even if IRRs for investments in Ohio early-stage companies are collectively as strong as or better than elsewhere in the U.S. and the venture industry as a whole, a deal-killer (literally)? It strikes me and many successful Ohio entrepreneurs I speak with that it should not be.   

While “should not be” is not a strategy that will make quantum leaps in capital formation and high growth entrepreneurship, IRR is.

Becca Braun is President of JumpStart Ventures. She founded and led a number of early-stage companies and organizations, as well as worked as a private equity investor and management consultant. She received her MBA from Harvard Business School and her BA in Linguistics from Harvard University. She is keenly interested in the intersection of wealth creation and broad-based regional economic growth.

Any entrepreneur looking to grow their business is always thinking (or should be) about how to improve their investor pitch. Once you have an opportunity to get in front of an investor, you want to do everything you can to make your pitch successful. I offered some tips I’ve learned during my years coaching entrepreneurs in my post, ‘Things NOT to Do When Presenting to Potential Investors‘. Last week, a fellow blogger, Timothy Hay posted ‘Entrepreneurs’ Most Common Mistakes When Pitching VCs‘, offering some great builds on the ideas I’d shared.

Some of the key mistakes he shares, and my thoughts on each:

1. Not at least considering the potential of taking your company public someday. - Although IPOs are about as common as Browns playoff appearances these days, shaping your company so that it could conceivably go public is a great way to ensure that you are touching all the bases and thinking big enough. And… you never know… the Browns might make the playoffs, and you could be a candidate for an IPO.

2. Being overconfident. - If you remember, I said in my post that ‘Not Bragging’ is a mistake. You DO need to be confident, knowledgeable and sell yourself and your team. You shouldn’t be overconfident, and act like you have all the answers, however — the VC knows that you don’t. And besides, VCs have big egos — if anyone has all the answers, it will be them! Be sure to be willing to say that you “don’t know” or that you are “unsure” to certain questions, while accepting suggestions from the investors — they have seen a lot of companies, and have a lot of knowledge to bring to the table. The trick is to be thought of as “confident”, but not “overconfident”.

3. Never being audited. - This is directly related to my mention of having your detailed financials prepared - and going a step further to have them audited. This shows potential investors that someone else has validated your books, and mitigates their risk and questions in this area. Despite that, do NOT put the detailed financials into your investor presentation — they don’t care at that point. When I was raising money for my company, Ion Optics, we handed interested investors a CD that had all of our slides, our more detailed business plan, audited financials, articles on the company and technology, and other tidbits. This showed attention to detail, and made the investor’s life a little easier.

Read Timothy’s full post - and share your questions and additions so we can continue to share the knowledge gained through our collective experiences.

Chris Mather is the President of JumpStart TechLift Advisors. Previously, he managed a number of technology initiatives in Northeast Ohio for NorTech. Before entering the economic development world, Chris ran a number of technology companies in Northeast Ohio and New England, including Ion Optics Inc., where he raised $6.7 million in venture capital, and Apsco Inc. and Gould Instrument Systems. Prior to that, he spent 13 years in sales, marketing and management roles with Hewlett Packard after graduating from Worcester Polytechnic Institute with a BS in Electrical Engineering.

Blogging for me is a challenge, especially when limited to the topic of early-stage investing in Northeast Ohio. It takes a long time to think of exciting topics to write about; I feel like everything’s already been said. But, since repetition is the key to learning, I’m going to risk repeating those items that are top-of-mind with the team here at JumpStart Ventures. To recap:

• Northeast Ohio needs more investment capital (Tell your legislators, friends and family to support renewal of the Ohio Third Frontier and The Ohio Capital Fund.
• Early-stage deal flow continues to grow while our investment dollars remain stagnant. JumpStart’s deal flow has grown 16% year-over-year since our inception in 2004 and, in the past year alone has increased 30%. All the while our investing budget has remained relatively stagnant at approximately $3 million per year. (See above bullet point re: supporting our primary source of funding, the Third Frontier.)
• Talent is really important. It’s a well known fact that top talent is critical to the success of any startup. All great ideas will languish without a talented and capable leader at the helm. The folks in Columbus know this and have put together a multi-faceted State-wide talent recruitment plan. This talent plan will only be realized with money from the Ohio Third Frontier (see first bullet). We have recently added our own talent guru, Robert Hatta, here at JumpStart to focus on bringing great talent to our companies.
• Exits are key. It’s a basic premise that investors want to see returns on their investments. Liquidity events generate returns. Companies that take OPM* need to continually work to position their company for an exit — an outright sale, an IPO, a re-cap, whatever. Just some type of event that provides an investor with an opportunity to make money on their investment within a reasonable time frame (like, say 5-8 years).

These are our “soapbox” issues. Issues we think about daily. Issues that need to be at the forefront of any dialogue around entrepreneurship and economic development in Northeast Ohio. So, even though it may seem like blah-blah-blah, I’ve-heard-all-this-before, we need to keep beating the drum (and repeating and repeating and repeating) until we’re heard.

*Other People’s Money

Lynn-Ann Gries is the Chief Investment Officer of JumpStart Ventures. She previously worked in the investment banking departments at both McDonald Investments and Smith Barney (now part of Citigroup), and in the sales and trading area at Morgan Stanley. She received her MBA from New York University’s Stern School of Business and her BA in Economics from Smith College. She currently serves on the board of the Fund for the Future of Shaker Heights, the Great Lakes Science Center and Summer on the Cuyahoga (SOTC).