JumpStart: IdeaExchange Blog

In 2008, according to PWC MoneyTree and VentureXpert, Ohio moved into the top quartile, among all states, for number of venture capital deals. In 2009, Ohio moved into the Top 10. The states ahead of Ohio are: California, Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania, Texas, Washington, New Jersey, Colorado, and Maryland. Ohio is the only Midwestern state to break into the Top 10.

As far as $$ invested, we are lower down on the list — 21st in 2009, where historically, over 10-15 years, Ohio has ranged from 9th to 28th, averaging about 21st. In order to move up to a Top 10 spot, investors would need to more than double the amount of capital going into Ohio’s early-stage companies. Has something like this been done before? Yup: Maryland, for example, moved from 22nd in 1992 and 25th in 1993 to 8th in 2006.   

So, risk-oriented investors might say, “That’s fine, Becca — love your passion for Ohio’s innovation environment — but, um, what about returns?” My answer is that they are pretty good: an analysis done by Chrysalis Ventures shows that returns in Midwestern deals were higher than returns in every other region except California and the Southeast (where the Southeast had fewer deals than the Midwest). I have not reviewed this analysis since 2006, but even if updating shows it to have fallen, the 2006 data do show that strong returns can be generated in the Midwest — Ohio included.

Those same risk-oriented investors might next say, “Yeah, but what about exits? As investors, we know, obviously, returns are a sign of exits, but still, how about stories: do you have great stories of exits, stories that capture the imagination and define a region? Where’s your Google? Your Amgen?”

OK, I have to admit: you got me there. We do not have many of those tales of Stanford PhDs or MIT wunderkinds opening up entirely new industries and IPO’ing five nanoseconds later, and let’s face it: those are fun, iconic tales that generated great returns and captured the imagination. But, here is the good news. An analysis I recently saw showed that Ohio entrepreneurs and investors are actually quite good at something that may be emerging as an enduring investment thesis in the venture industry: entrepreneurs raising money in a capital efficient manner from smaller funds and growing solidly and well to provide those funds with nice returns, IRRs that are above-equity-stock-indices-and-above-venture-IRRs-as-a-whole-but-(admittedly)-no-Google/Amgen.  

I cannot, alas, offer here the details of this analysis because the person who conducted it is a trusted Ohio investor who was able to get many of his peer investors to offer up information that they requested not be made public. But I can, for illustrative purposes, offer up names of some of the companies whose exits were public domain and that collectively make the point that we do have exits, good exits, sometimes great exits, but admittedly not iconic, blockbuster exits. In IT, over the past 5-10 years, Ohio entrepreneurs and investors have seen exits from angel or venture-backed companies like Hyland, Plansoft, Brulant, Flashline, TMW Systems, Everstream, MRI, Northcoast PCS, Entek, and many more. In Healthcare, over the past handful of years, there is WholeHealth, MemberHealth, RIS Logic, Edgepark Surgical, Cleveland BioLabs, Atricure, NDI Medical, and many more. In Cleantech, of late, there is Sorbent Technologies and Solar Fields, plus others, and in Business Services, there is Flight Options, Atomic Dog Publishing, and more.

So, here is the summary of all this. Ohio is Top 10 nationwide in investment activity and Ohio’s entrepreneurial strengths are in areas where the venture industry may well be moving: Ohio growth businesses and entrepreneurs are capital efficient and, among states, Ohio is among the leaders on consistently starting strong, high growth businesses that pragmatically solve a certain problem in the world, grow quickly, and generate solid returns. This entrepreneurial mindset, or strategy, if you want to call it that, offers an outsized return to investors as shown by the Chrysalis analysis. The entrepreneurs who led these businesses are adept at growing more of these types of businesses as CEOs, serial entrepreneurs, angel investors, and board members.

These are all reasonable strengths to build on. With a lot of effort, which is what anything worth doing takes, we could become a Top 5 state in venture activity (deals, not dollars, given the more capital efficient nature of Ohio growth stories). Wouldn’t that be great?  

That’s not a rhetorical question, because I guess what I want to know is this: is this compelling? Is the paucity of iconic IPOs that capture the imagination, even if IRRs for investments in Ohio early-stage companies are collectively as strong as or better than elsewhere in the U.S. and the venture industry as a whole, a deal-killer (literally)? It strikes me and many successful Ohio entrepreneurs I speak with that it should not be.   

While “should not be” is not a strategy that will make quantum leaps in capital formation and high growth entrepreneurship, IRR is.

Becca Braun is President of JumpStart Ventures. She founded and led a number of early-stage companies and organizations, as well as worked as a private equity investor and management consultant. She received her MBA from Harvard Business School and her BA in Linguistics from Harvard University. She is keenly interested in the intersection of wealth creation and broad-based regional economic growth.

Issue 1 is a statewide ballot measure that would authorize renewal and continuation of the highly successful Ohio Third Frontier (OTF) program. OTF is a visionary public-private partnership created in 2002 with bipartisan legislative leadership and support as well as widespread editorial support.

The purpose of OTF is to firmly establish Ohio as an innovation leader and to fuel long-term economic growth and create jobs in our state. OTF targets state investments to promising industries, technologies, and entrepreneurs. The initiative is directed by a bipartisan, appointed advisory board and commission. Funds are awarded through a competitive process in which independent experts review proposals and assure a base level of excellence for all projects.

With a 10 year initial life and an initial commitment of $1.6 billion, OTF has emerged as the centerpiece of Ohio’s technology-based economic development and job creation efforts. The bond funding mechanism for OTF, approved by Ohio voters in 2005, expires in 2012. On February 3, 2010, the Ohio General Assembly authorized a bond measure on the May 2010 ballot at a level of $700 million over four years. Support for placing the bond issue on the ballot was strong and bipartisan (30-2 in the Senate, 83-14 in the House).

OTF also has proven results including helping to:

• Create over 48,000 jobs.
• Attract or capitalize 571 startup companies.
• Attract $3.2 billion in follow-on dollars (from federal, state, local, private, and foundation funds) on top of the $473 million it has expended (through June 2009) on technology-based programs.
• Produce more than $6.6 billion in total economic impact in Ohio (through December 2008).
• Produce a total return on investment that has averaged 22% per year over the life of the initiative.
• Grow product sales from OTF-funded projects to $440 million per year (through June 2009) and are estimated to total at least $900 million by 2013.
• Double licensing income earned by Ohio’s leading research institutions from 2002 to 2007 it rose from $16 million to $40 million.
• Increase Ohio’s research base, from 2002 through 2008, it increased more than 60 percent, from $1.1 billion to $1.8 billion.
• Increase venture capital investment in Ohio. From 2003 through 2008, venture capital investment in the state grew almost 2.5 times faster than the U.S. average – 20.4% per year compared to 8.6% per year.
• And, 50% of the State’s OTF investment to date (through December 2008) has been repaid through tax receipts. The original investment, now projected to be $1.35 billion, is forecast to be fully repaid by 2014.

Most importantly for JumpStart and the entrepreneurs across Northeast Ohio and the State, OTF provides the opportunity for future potential critical resources which will leverage significant non-state resources for both direct investments into companies and for additional resources that may support the work of all of the Edison incubators in the region. The incubators include the Akron Global Business Accelerator, BioEnterprise, Braintree in Mansfield, GLIDE in Elyria, MAGNET, and the Youngstown Business Incubator, in addition to our local research-focused Universities and innovative established companies in the state.

Please read more about Issue 1 and please join everyone at JumpStart to help accelerate the progress of innovative companies in Ohio!

In the above blog, Ray is expressing his personal views as a citizen of the State of Ohio.

Ray Leach is CEO of JumpStart and brings his energy and leadership experiences from founding five high growth entrepreneurial and intrapreneurial endeavors in the last 20 years. Ray is a Sloan Fellow and earned an MBA from the MIT Sloan School of Management. He also earned a BA in Finance from the University of Akron.

It’s that time of year, the State of the Union/State time of year. And while I won’t give you a State of JumpStart address here, it’s become obvious to me that:

The State of Cleantech In Northeast Ohio is booming.

The Governor of Ohio, Ted Strickland, visited a JumpStart Ventures portfolio company yesterday, rexorce thermionics (in the process of changing its name to Echogen Power Systems). Aside from the company’s accomplishments including the installation of its commercial pilot for its heat engine and the creation of 20 engineering jobs, the Governor was visiting because it’s the perfect example of the growth of the cleantech sector in Ohio. A few other examples showing this is real growth, not just rhetoric, from The 2009 Venture Capital Report for the Cleveland Plus Region:

• Cleantech companies are the fastest growing segment of companies receiving venture capital or angel investment in the Cleveland Plus region. While they received only 3% of the dollars 5 years ago, they received 20% of the dollars in 2009.
• 33 cleantech companies have received venture or angel investment in the last five years.

One of those companies is VADXX Energy, whose CEO, Jim Garrett, presented its business plan yesterday at JumpStart to the Oberlin Entrepreneurial Scholars. VADXX Energy, which transforms waste plastics (such as the seats of old cars) back into synthetic crude oil, set up its first production facility in Akron recently, and will shortly be starting its first commercial pilot production.

Another of those companies is Phycal, a JumpStart Ventures portfolio company creating algal biofuel. Aside from the algal pool in its Mayfield Heights location, the company is in the process of setting up its first pilot production facility in Hawaii. Phycal was identified as one of BusinessWeek’s 25 Most Intriguing Companies last month.

With the Federal and State initiatives that will ultimately be funding Northeast Ohio cleantech companies in the future, with the new advanced energy incubator in Warren moving forward, and with the continued support of Ohio Third Frontier, there’s no better place to be for a cleantech company.

Cathy Belk is the Chief Marketing Officer of JumpStart. She specializes in branding, marketing communications, and business management. She brings 16+ years of experience in a variety of marketing and business roles, but gets her energy from working daily with entrepreneurs and their growing companies.

Blogging for me is a challenge, especially when limited to the topic of early-stage investing in Northeast Ohio. It takes a long time to think of exciting topics to write about; I feel like everything’s already been said. But, since repetition is the key to learning, I’m going to risk repeating those items that are top-of-mind with the team here at JumpStart Ventures. To recap:

• Northeast Ohio needs more investment capital (Tell your legislators, friends and family to support renewal of the Ohio Third Frontier and The Ohio Capital Fund.
• Early-stage deal flow continues to grow while our investment dollars remain stagnant. JumpStart’s deal flow has grown 16% year-over-year since our inception in 2004 and, in the past year alone has increased 30%. All the while our investing budget has remained relatively stagnant at approximately $3 million per year. (See above bullet point re: supporting our primary source of funding, the Third Frontier.)
• Talent is really important. It’s a well known fact that top talent is critical to the success of any startup. All great ideas will languish without a talented and capable leader at the helm. The folks in Columbus know this and have put together a multi-faceted State-wide talent recruitment plan. This talent plan will only be realized with money from the Ohio Third Frontier (see first bullet). We have recently added our own talent guru, Robert Hatta, here at JumpStart to focus on bringing great talent to our companies.
• Exits are key. It’s a basic premise that investors want to see returns on their investments. Liquidity events generate returns. Companies that take OPM* need to continually work to position their company for an exit — an outright sale, an IPO, a re-cap, whatever. Just some type of event that provides an investor with an opportunity to make money on their investment within a reasonable time frame (like, say 5-8 years).

These are our “soapbox” issues. Issues we think about daily. Issues that need to be at the forefront of any dialogue around entrepreneurship and economic development in Northeast Ohio. So, even though it may seem like blah-blah-blah, I’ve-heard-all-this-before, we need to keep beating the drum (and repeating and repeating and repeating) until we’re heard.

*Other People’s Money

Lynn-Ann Gries is the Chief Investment Officer of JumpStart Ventures. She previously worked in the investment banking departments at both McDonald Investments and Smith Barney (now part of Citigroup), and in the sales and trading area at Morgan Stanley. She received her MBA from New York University’s Stern School of Business and her BA in Economics from Smith College. She currently serves on the board of the Fund for the Future of Shaker Heights, the Great Lakes Science Center and Summer on the Cuyahoga (SOTC).